Riley Gaines Turns Down $3 Million Nike Deal—“I’d Rather Lose Money Than Save a Woke Brand” Why would an athlete give up millions of dollars?

Riley Gaines, a former NCAA swimmer, flatly refused to partner with Nike despite being offered $3 million. She believes Nike doesn’t truly care about empowering women and only uses women as a tool to increase profits whenever possible.

Gaines criticized Nike for its recent Super Bowl ad featuring female athletes like Caitlin Clark and Sha’Carri Richardson.

She said the ad did not reflect the reality of how Nike treats women. Gaines cited the case of Allyson Felix, a seven-time Olympic gold medalist. Felix was cut 70% of her Nike sponsorship when she became pregnant and was forced to start her own footwear company .

Picture background

Gaines also criticized Nike for its policy of supporting transgender athletes in women’s sports, which she said was unfair and did not reflect the views of the majority of Americans. A New York Times/Ipsos poll found that 79% of Americans disagree with allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports.

Riley Gaines Turns Down $3 Million Partnership With Nike: “I'm Not Saving  Your Woke Brand” – Dunning-Kruger-Times.com

Riley Gaines’ View

Gaines believes that Nike only cares about women when the company benefits or makes a profit.
She believes that Nike’s advertising does not reflect the reality of how they treat women.
Gaines does not accept that Nike supports and facilitates men’s participation in women’s sports in the name of feminism.

Public Reaction

Public reaction to Gaines’ stance was mixed. Some supported her stance, arguing that women’s sports should be protected and fair. However, others criticized Gaines, arguing that she did not understand the value of diversity and inclusion in sports.
Lessons from the Riley Gaines v. Nike case

The Riley Gaines v. Nike case illustrates the complexity of the issue of representation and empowerment of women in sports. It also illustrates the differences in views between the parties involved and the need for open and honest dialogue on the issue.

Conclusion

Riley Gaines declined to partner with Nike because of differences in her views on women’s empowerment and Nike’s policy on transgender athletes. The case illustrates the complexity of the issue of representation and empowerment of women in sports and the need for open and honest dialogue on the issue.

Related articles

Judge Charles Hargrove mocked Karoline Leavitt’s faith

In a stunning twist of legal drama, Federal Judge Charles Hargrove has reportedly fled the United States following an explosive $800 million defamation lawsuit spearheaded by Karoline…

No One Expected What Happened After Tyrus Faced Off With The View

In a shocking turn of events, ABC has quietly removed The View from its schedule just hours after Fox News contributor and former professional wrestler Tyrus appeared on the…

Harrison Ford Kicked Off The View After Explosive Clash with Joy Behar

In a moment that has stunned viewers and left the entertainment world buzzing, Harrison Ford, the legendary actor known for his roles in Indiana Jones and Star Wars, erupted on The…

How Judge Edward Chen Froze a Courtroom, Crushed Pam Bondi’s Nomination, and Left the Legal World Shaken Pam Bondi thought she was there to perform

Pam Bondi, the former Florida Attorney General and loyal Trump surrogate, arrived at the San Francisco federal courthouse on June 25, 2025 wearing her signature white blazer and a…

Jon Stewart Vows ‘I Won’t Be Silenced’ Shakeup Claims Colbert

Just days after CBS confirmed The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will be ending after its upcoming season, whispers began swirling about what’s next for other long-running satirical programs….

Leavitt Walked Into Colbert’s Trap—And It Destroyed Her

The studio was buzzing with the usual late-night energy, the bright lights and clinking sounds of coffee cups and chairs scraping against the floor. It was a…